|
|
Hi A, Thanks for investing some time in an article from the KD-material. I must say I really like the excerpts you picked out, so I can say that they are representative for the tone of the material as a whole. Your questions and answers (or does the 'A' stand for your name) made me realize that the 'paradigm' or the set of hypotheses from which we start off are quite different. This means that we seem to differ on basic issues, but I guess the differences can't be that great, otherwise I wouldn't have found so many similarities in the articles I read, and the words of the C's (or our possible future ancestors, as I would call them from this KD-perspective, but I guess the C's prefer the name they have now). Like I said before I try to find bridges between this KD-paradigm and the ones I come across in the through your website. In order to understand each other better (and I believe this is worthwhile) I would like to take a look at the assumptions in some of your answers, since they could give a nice clue to the differences in the ascension-paradigm we work with.
You write:
We seem to have a different view on Earth here. I am not telling the truth here or anything, just explaining some aspects of the KD-paradigm (as far as I can grasp it now). Earth is seen as the consciousness of our planet. In order for anything to ascend consciousness is needed on some level. In this paradigm ascension implies (amongst other things) the growth of awareness by integrating unconscious, or forgotten material. This would go not only for our planet but for every person who would decide to ascend along. Without consciousness no ascension. Within this paradigm the consciousness of Earth is considered to be far more wide and advanced than the level of consciousness of a single person living on Earth. The more a person ascends, the more he or she is able to grasp. So, viewed from this perspective when you say that 'Earth is descending' that would imply that you have reached the level of awareness to determine whether the consciousness of our planet is either ascending or descending. I think we are not yet in the position to make either possibility a definite one. I think we do have possibilities to increase or decrease the likelihood of a global ascension. In my Dutch 'Center of Ascension-Information and Research' I have tried to study the likelihood of an ascending Earth, since it would have quite a lot of characteristics. We could go into these later, but to give you a feeling, according to this KD-paradigm an ascending Earth would imply a gradual decrease of Earth-gravity, an increase in body-temperature (Earth Body that is, climate change) and the expansion of Earth. It seems to me that when you say that Earth is descending you are heavily influenced by the role humanity plays on the globe. Although the Earth consciousness would try to do her best to reach humanity, most of humanity is too caught in their daily hassles. She would need to continue with her own ascension process with or without 6 billion people in order to be ready when the 'wave' arrives. She is doing her best to remind people of the possibility to ascend along with her. What I am basically saying is that I would propose to change the words 'Earth is not ascending' into 'most of present humanity isn't ascending'. And because we have already arrived at rock bottom there isn't much room left for any further descension. I'll go into other aspects of your response later. I'm going to bed now. It is already far too late. In 5 hours we will be awakened by our baby daughter…and G., thanks for welcoming me. I hope I will like it here.
Thanks for reading,
|
