Related Articles:
In response to the 'thought form rating scale' article Larry wrote to me, saying:
Your idea of difficulty is so very odd to me after all how hard is it to change your mind and then edit or refuse to allow any thought in your mind that is not loving?
Right, if it were only that simple. If it were possible that one could easily edit the thoughts that one thinks, many problems in our present world would no longer exist. In the page on 'ascension and forensic psychiatry' I talk about people who have committed terrible crimes. Somehow these people noticed 'unloving' thoughts but developed those thoughts anyway, eventually leading to delinquent behavior.
Why would people have so much trouble with changing their mode of thinking that all kinds of therapies are needed to get this process started? I think it is not so easy to get into a more 'loving mode' of thinking and living.
In the perspective of the SSOA the Anu family members could think whatever they wanted, but their thoughts remained rather distorted for they would simply not have the right genetic build up to function harmlessly on our planet. Apparently their power of will, or their power to become more harmoniously aligned with Earth wasn't enough to change their genetics, nor their thoughts.
What I have come to accept in my current hypothetical reality structure is that we are rather genetically dysfunctional. Because of this we are inclined to tune into dysfunctional thoughts that resonate with it. We tend to repeat the same themes (and perhaps behavior) that have been played out so often by our ancestors because that are the kind of thoughts our genes have learned to tune in to.
Fortunately this perspective opens the possibility to change our genetic structure, slowly and gradually from dysfunctional to slightly less dysfunctional. By altering the mode of thinking it seems to be possible to think thoughts that are less harmful or in Larry's words, more loving.
I have started to talk about 'memes' since the thought form rating scale article and Larry used this term as well, when he said:
And recognise that memes often relate or are attracted to certain individuals based on the shadow self or the hidden emotional scars inside.EMOTIONS, FORGIVENESS AND CONSCIOUS WILL
And to transmute them only requires healing the emotions inside.
I have learned that you can realize the dysfunctional quality of some thoughts (and of some behavior). You can actually edit them out, just like Larry say, because you don't want to embrace those thoughts anymore. These kinds of transmutations occur without any emotional arousal, nor any act of forgiveness.
Today I pondered a bit about forgiveness again. In the slightly 'provocative' article called 'Cut the Athena Crap' I talk about my inability to actually consciously realize anything that the SSOA says about the dynamics within the Anu family and what they have done to their own slaves and to the seeded root races. I used to accept the idea that forgiveness can be activated even though you don't realize anything consciously: it would all happen in the unconscious realms (see Too Much Unconsciousness and Continuing the Karma Quest). Now I'm not so sure about this 'technique' anymore.
I would glady forgive certain behavior that my ancestors have committed, but I need to see what they have done with my own (inner) eyes, even if it were only in dreamtime, how else could I forgive, let alone 'absolutely' forgive? I think I will stop this mode of forgiving my ancient Anu/Root Race ancestors without realizing what I forgive. If I am able to transmute certain thoughts, with or without emotional arousal, that is the best that I can do now. Perhaps my awareness will expand this way leading to a more conscious understanding of what happened in our ancient past.
Perhaps the mechanism is that the ancestors monitor your thought transmutation process closely and when it appears successful they adopt it as well.
POSITIVE THINKING?
After putting this page on-line I noticed that the 'google-ad-machine' chose a few links to sites dealing with positive thinking. Somehow I don't like this concept, nor do I like to talk about 'loving thoughts' when I come to think of it. I prefer the term 'harmless thoughts' to describe the thoughts that have turned 'less fractured'. It seems to me that the danger in positive thinking is that you might start denying certain 'fractured' aspects, creating a false 'love-and-light' reality.
Feel free to respond,
Gibbon
October 2006