Related Articles:
I read your article about silica/silicon, and it raised a few interesting points.
Have you emailed Thomas of the SSOA about your questions, because the point probably 'needs to be viewed from a completely different perspective altogether'.
N.N.
Nice to hear from you. During the years my distance with the ssoa-kernel has increased, apparently to such an extent that I really don't know who Thomas is, although I do have a vague remembrance which I cannot put my finger on.
It is my experience that people within the ssoa-community prefer to listen to Mila, and perhaps to each other, but they do not like to open up to questions from those outside of their community. They seem to regard them as those 'stealing' all kinds of stuff, being absorbed by evil agents working through the dark caverns of the space between, having dangerous anu-lineages endangering the ascension process of everyone connecting to them.
The most common thing during my four years after I discovered Mila's/Karen's material was that people contacted me either before they entered the SSoA or after they had left it.
The most likely explanation I can give is that somehow the people within the realms of Mila's philosophy are brainwashed to such an extent that they truly believe that it is dangerous to interact with people outside of their organisation.
So, even though I (and Ken and Monique) have offered Mila and Oa the opportunity to discuss matters they have mostly ignored us. I used to be interested in their responses, but I have lost interest. I don't really care that much what they think about the direction I am heading on my site: anu mapcarving would probably like be swearing in the ssoa-church!
I feel a bit sad to have to use the term 'ssoa-church': something that they have always warned against. I think it has happened to them the last couple of years, perhaps it has turned into a new Pharoah Island?
If you do still believe in communicating and exchanging thoughts please do so and tell Thomas about the page. If anyone affiliated with the ssoa cares to write to me that would be nice because I'm always ready to open to other people's perspective, although I'm not as eager to share thoughts with ssoa-affiliated people as I used to be. I guess the differences have gotten a bit too big on certain issues.
Perhaps I'm looking at the silicon/silica matter from a twisted perspective, but if nobody from the ssoa is sovereign enough to present alternative interpretations I have to opt for the best interpretation I can think of.
I guess that people within the SSOA are so occupied with either keeping up with Mila's new insights or fighting the evil attacks from outside (or from within) that not much time is left to question anything else, always busy, busy, busy.
I have always said that it is dangerous to leave such a possibly important process as our common biological ascension to one or two people and a lot of devotees. I think the circle really needs to expand.
Well, this email turns out to be one of the most critical towards the SSOA-organisation so far. No matter how critical I may sound, I will always have a great sense of respect for their work and their ideas, because I wouldn't have been where I am now without them.
Try to get a response from Thomas: I would love to be corrected if his interpretation makes sense.
See you,
Gibbon