Exploring Ascension: Integrating Loosh
 

Integrating Loosh

Combining Loosh and Biological Ascension Realities

  Random Thoughts - November 2007

'Random Thoughts' Main Page - Exploring Ascension Section - What's New?


Recommended Reading:


INTRODUCTION
Before reading this page I strongly advise readers to first read the 'loosh-perspective'-article, unless you are familiar with the 'RAM' concept of 'loosh'. Within this page I try to connect the various loosh-elements with the ascension paradigm that I have come to work with. Let's see how useful this combination could turn out to be.

LIFE GIVING LOOSH
Although it might be tempting to regard the collection of the produced loosh by human beings (and by animals and other elements of life) as something harmful, I am inclined to think differently about it. I am beginning to accept the possibility that indeed we were 'developed' on this planet to see if we could produce a useful amount of 'loosh'. Apparently we were able to do so and in amounts that even our creator didn't expect.

When there is conflict we produce loosh, when a plant, animal or human dies, loosh is produced. When we protect other people, when we fear being harmed (or eaten) or when we feel lonely: we would be producing loosh. This loosh would be collected by a number of 'collectors' who have made 'pathways' to a place where our creator would stem from. It is not entirely known what happens to all that loosh.

In Monroe's second book 'Far Journeys' you can read about the loosh being 'bent' to a kind of beams that move to the place that needs it most. In some possible future scenario Monroe meets people who consciously make and collect loosh, just like bees. The difference being that they know what they are doing and why and they say that they are happy to do it.

What does all this imply? Well for one, that the food chain doesn't seem to be such a bad concept. Everytime something is eaten it dies and the act of death produces loosh. It provides for reasons for conflict: animals hunt or are hunted which creates loosh. All the animals that die for our food production create loosh when they pass away.

If I - for the time being - accept the idea that the production and collection of loosh might be a useful way to 'fuel' life on a level that I cannot comprehend it would mean that it really isn't all that bad, all these conflicts in the world: an enormous loosh-production 'arena'-factory, indeed!

BECOMING BETTER LOOSH-PRODUCERS
If we as humanity wouldn't have been able to produce loosh we wouldn't have been here in the first place. So, to a certain degree we should be thankful for that 'Someone' that created us. On top of that we were given 'a part of this Someone' which gave us a glimpse of our connection to our creator. Since our creator was created himself, it also gives us the opportunity to connect to our creator's creator through that piece that was given to us.

If I have read Monroe correctly it is suggested that we are able to become better loosh-producers. We would be able to produce more 'refined' loosh. On page 188, near the end of chapter 12 from my Dutch translation we can read a destilled-loosh-producing 'D.L.P.-formula':

The creation of pure, distilled Loosh is brought forth in humans by the action of unfulfillment, but only if such pattern is enacted at a vibratory level above the sensory bounds of the environment. The greater the intensity of said pattern, the greater the output of Loosh distillate.

If I take up this piece of text and put it in a biological ascension wrapper, it provides interesting possibilities. Let's explore these for a minute.

BIOLOGICAL ASCENSION
It is very likely that I am making grave mistakes by trying to combine the loosh perspective with the biological ascension perspective. It might very well be that I have become so enamoured by the ascension paradigm that I am simply unable to give it up, regardless of any other information. I would like to stress that the following possibilities are nothing more than that: possibilities. I want to see if any of these approaches might turn out to be useful for my own vibratory level and the 'joy' within my cells. I will be exploring more combinations in future articles.

THE CREATOR AND ITS CREATION
In a september 2007 message through Karen Danrich "Mila", called 'Fulfilling Upon the Map of Ascension' we could find an interesting vista on the idea of creators creating other creators:

Something occurred twenty five Tao cycles ago however that has led to what is occurring upon Earth and this region of domain that is falling to extinction. Twenty five cycles ago, creators were allowed to cast other creators, much like humans that cast dolphins and whales who went on to cast other sea creatures inside the Great Central Sun Dream.

Creators enjoyed casting creators so greatly that they also became lost. Some creations were left behind in this cycle and never were fully recovered in the cycles that followed. In each cycle to follow more and more creators cast more creators and became lost for parallel circumstance.

In the past twelve cycles, even a worse fate however has occurred than simply creators becoming lost due to creating too many creators; creators fell into consuming other creations to continue to exist for they had fallen into such distortion that they could no longer sustain their own creations with the chi generated through them. This is how consumption began, and it is as consumption occurred that the greatest "crime" perhaps of all time has ever occurred within the Tao.
Fulfilling Upon the Map of Ascension

Within the SSOA-paradigm it is often stated that there is bond between the creator and that what is has created. Within the loosh-perspective this would mean that not only do we desire to reconnect with our creator due to that piece of it that it put inside of us, but to become 'whole' the creator might develop the desire to reconnect to us as well.

THE TAO AND OUR CREATOR
If we continue in this line of thought it could be that the Tao, which is defined as some 'primal creator', wanted all parts of its creation to return back to it. That would imply that every creator and sub-creator would need to become 'whole' again, which means that it would have to return its own creation (and creators) back to itself. In order to fulfill in such an endeavour it would need to find a way to do such a thing. Creating a creation is one thing, but to call it back might be quite another thing.

If there would indeed be a 'lack of chi' around to sustain other creations, it might well have happened that other creators have interfered in the project of our creator in order to 'steal' some loosh from this creation. Perhaps the lack of 'loosh' is so compelling that some are investing quite a lot of effort in producing extreme amounts of loosh. This process of extreme loosh-production might however be useful in sustaining a creation, but it might not be the best way to 'wrap up' a creation. It may only continue a sense of dependency by the creator on its creation.

Instead of the mere loosh-production it might be useful to consider ways to return the creation back to its original creator. First one need to get rid of all the 'foreign' elements and secondly it might be useful to devise a way to return the creation back while keeping up the loosh-production. Perhaps that is where the biological ascension idea comes in: if human beings could be created that would have a 'higher' vibration (closer to its creator), being able to produce more destilled and more refined loosh it could satisfy the loosh-needs and at the same time it would allow the creator to 'lift' its own 'pieces' out of this creation and back to itself.

The Anu would have created one brand of human beings and they added their own genetics to that brand. In time this connection between the Anu and their creation led them to become 'stuck' to Earth. If indeed there is something like 'a connection' between the creator and its creation it might be that our creator is connected to us in the same fashion. Our 'distortion' may have a parallel distortion effect on our creator. In order to deal with this it might be necessary to fix these distortions, even though it may lead to less loosh-production.

Perhaps there is a way to produce loosh without creating all the associated distortions. If we believe one of Monroe's visits to the future it would be very well possible.

Is this a creative and rational product of my solitary mind or could it contain elements that move beyond these limitations? I would like to hear your take on this, please e-mail me by pushing the mail-box below.

Gibbon
November 2007

To read some other discussions on Loosh see:

To top of page


 

Mail to:  gibbon@tiscali.nl  Main Page of this Section