|
|
Is Ascension Terminology
|
Recommended Reading:
INTRODUCTION
After the recent karma trilogy (see Karma Magic) more doubt has risen in my mind about the necessity to think in a certain ascension frame work in order to be able to ascend.
In an old article from March 2005 (see recommended reading) I mention the possibility that Mila described that some people are likely to move ahead in their ascension process without being aware of it, or without consciously intending ascension. People who are able to ascend their bodies without ever having heard of anything like the Anu, the pendulum, chakra's, subtle bodies, spells, grand masters, false gods, akashic record keepers and ascension temples.
ASCENSION TERMINOLOGY NEEDED?
I used to think that the intent to ascension was crucial for this process to catch on, but perhaps there are many other ways in which this process can develop? A recent email from oKa in which she responds to the karma-trilogy started to ring more bells. She talks about some people having devices or machinery planted in their etheric fields which limit their ability to ascend. As far as I know she wasn't referring to me. She describes how to dismantle these devices through visualisation and through understanding. If you are interested in that article ask for it and I will send it to you; oKa has put the articles on a few forums herself.
Could it really be true that you can only ascend if you intend the removal of these devices and the like? It was after talking to a few friends the last couple of days that I started to doubt the necessity of all this.
REMOVAL OF DISTORTION AS THE MAIN KEY
The big question for me now is: does it really matter that much which reality perspective you embrace, as long as it contains the idea of clearing harmful modes of relating to yourself and others? I don't think that it matters that much.
Imagine someone working from a psychological perspective: intending to uncover and understand as much unconscious elements that one can find in themselves, actively trying to pay attention to 'counter transference' mechanisms, paying attention to what they feel at certain moments with the desire to know more about themselves, trying to understand what caused certain modes of relating to the world. Aren't people who are working from this perspective clearing distorted thought-form?
Wouldn't it make sense that whenever people manage to change distorted thought-form the body adapts? Wouldn't people feel better after clearing harmful patterns? I would like to know if ascension 'automatically' occurs whenever people do this clearing work on a regular basis. The problem probably is that it can be hard to remain focused. The advantage of the ascension terminology for me is that it allows me to stay tuned to this process of clearing energetic obstacles and limiting beliefs.
CONCLUSION
If the idea to ascend oneself is really such a key element in the way we were designed (see Structure of Creation), it would make sense that this idea is ingrained into our cells, into our 'soul'. If indeed the clearing of harmful patterns of relating to the world and ourselves is the main tool to increase your awareness and our biological vibration then it doesn't really matter what brand that tool has. It could be called 'ascension' but it could bear many other names. Biological changes as described by Mila would be the natural result of becoming more harmless.
Gibbon,
February 2007
|
|