|
|
Knowing vs Exploring |
Recommended Reading:
CHANGING PERCEPTION
Communication with other people can sometimes truly trigger unexpected processes. Take for instance the interaction with oKa lately (see karma-trilogy above). She wanted to point something out to me and it in stead led to the discovery of certain patterns and beliefs that I didn't want to accept any longer as part of my reality. I took another swing against the belief in pendulum dependency as a necessary element for one's ascension process and I shifted my karma focus. In stead of looking at the results (the karma) I now prefer to focus on the underlying thought-forms that caused the multiple karma in the first place.
I am strengthened in this path by a few interesting passages from 'Path of Empowerment' by B. Marciniak (2004):
"Your perceptual shifts in the here and now actually ripple throughout the lines of time, broadcasting your selection of new codes of consciousness. And this is how healing along the lines of time occurs." (page 144)By altering my beliefs, my memes, I change my reality and I clear all the associated karma as a result of this change in perception. In connection to our genetics and how they store karma and the underlying thought-forms (or patterns, or algorithms) I was glad to find this excerpt, a few lines further in the same book:
"The healing of the human gene pool is about releasing trapped pain and fear by transforming old thought patterns that contain restrictive attitudes, and bringin a state of higher awareness into the body." (p.145)
This really is hardly any different than the distorted fractured magnetics perspective which opens the possibility to alter 'electrical' distorted perceptions into less fractured magnetics, slowly changing from angular to round thought-forms.
KNOWING VS. EXPLORING
I really don't know if it is sympathetic towards oKa, but she has triggered yet another realization in my system. I hope she is able to see the humor in it. In a recent letter (January 2007) she wrote:
When you do know something inside out (and we know truth by experiencing, no other way).. cannot preface anything with IMO, or 'i think', or 'i believe'.. because i know .. and when i don't, i ask earth/guardians and they tell me. I didnt 'master' karma with opinions, theories or beliefs.This for me clearly illustrates a different approach than the one I prefer. In my writings I have tried to see my perspective as a kind of working hypothesis: it was a system which was open to change. It was based on certain beliefs and elements and I tried to work from that. A few years ago it was highly colored by the SSOA-perspective and from there I traveled into another vista of matters. This doesn't mean that I am sure about anything. I cannot tell you that I KNOW anything absolutely for certain. It is a system of best guesses and things that worked before and that seem likely to me, nothing more, nothing less.
It is therefore that I speak of 'exploring' ascension, since I am very much aware of my limited perspective, but I have faith in the possibility of expanding my awareness through delving into these matters and by learning to attune to your own 'sources of wisdom'. It is from this view that I often use words like 'I think', 'I believe', 'I guess' or 'perhaps'. I hardly use the verb 'I know' because I don't think that I am in a position to use this verb. What I believe to be true in one moment could turn out to be a deviation in the other.
In the quote from oKa I cannot help but sense a kind of arrogance combined with a slight disdain for words like 'IMO', 'I think' or 'I believe'. It is of course everybody's right to create it's own reality perspective, but it is also my right to not accept someone else's perspective as true for me. I have learnt that through understanding the differences in perception I am again able to speak to someone without being affected by these differences. If these changes continue to be part of a certain communication it is perhaps best to stop the dance, at least for the time being.
Gibbon,
January 2007
|
|